Guests
Welcome!
Sign Up
Log On

Search


 

Information Research Weblog






Subject RE: Hitting on Google.
Posted 7/22/2003; 8:38 PM by Grahame Gould
Last Modified 7/22/2003; 8:38 PM by Grahame Gould
In Response To Hitting on Google. (#197)
Label None. Read 608
<<PREVIOUS NEXT>> TOP THREAD EDIT REPLY
.
Tom, I think you may have misunderstood what "Slate" was saying. I suspect that he wasn't searching for that particular site but pointing out that the most common meaning of "apple" appears after 50 other pages.

However, I agree that to criticise Google for it seems unfair. He sounds like a bit of a luddite in some ways.

It seems a bit silly to criticise technology for having a focus on technology. I can see his point, but it's an argument that I would think would be easily shot down as especially as it is used to criticise Google.

Google only reports on what's out there. If apple growers, producers, sellers, lovers etc don't have a dominant presence on the web, it's not Google's fault.

.
<<PREVIOUS NEXT>> TOP THREAD EDIT REPLY
ENCLOSURES

None.
REPLIES

None.
 




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.



This site managed with Conversant, © Copyright 2009 Macrobyte Resources

Channels


Digital Libraries

Education

Electronic publishing

Freedom of information

Information Management

Intellectual Property

Internet

Knowledge management

Personal

Records management

Resources

Searching

Software

Technology

Weblogs

Wireless

Words