Guests
Welcome!
Sign Up
Log On

Search


 

Information Research Weblog






Subject More language mangling
Posted 2/13/2005; 6:21 PM by Tom Wilson
Last Modified 2/13/2005; 6:21 PM by Tom Wilson
In Response To (#Top of Thread.)
Label None. Read 894
<<PREVIOUS NEXT>> TOP THREAD EDIT REPLY
.

If anyone has had a word with the Editor by now, I imagine that the Financial Times will be a little embarrassed as a result of a slip by one Ben Hunt, writing on ‘Rivals seek clearer line on BT’s future’. He writes:

After a week of running a fine tooth-comb through BT’s proposals for a new regulatory structure for the industry, the group’s rivals have concluded that the plans do not represent the basis for a fair settlement.

Of course, the emphasis there is mine: there is no such thing as a ‘tooth-comb’ and I wonder what Mr. Hunt imagined its purpose might be? The correct phrase is, ‘a fine-toothed comb’ – the kind of thing that mothers used to (perhaps still do in some places) run through their kids’ hair, searching for hair lice. In spoken English it is often carelessly mis-pronounced to sound like ‘fine tooth-comb’, but surely when written down it is an obvious nonsense?

.
<<PREVIOUS NEXT>> TOP THREAD EDIT REPLY
ENCLOSURES

None.
REPLIES

RE: More language mangling ( 2/13/2005 by Grahame Gould )
I suspect that the embarrassment will be very small (if any) considering how

 




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.



This site managed with Conversant, © Copyright 2008 Macrobyte Resources

Channels


Digital Libraries

Education

Electronic publishing

Freedom of information

Information Management

Intellectual Property

Internet

Knowledge management

Personal

Records management

Resources

Searching

Software

Technology

Weblogs

Wireless

Words