Guests
Welcome!
Sign Up
Log On

Search


 

Information Research Weblog






Subject Re: Semantic Weblogging.
Posted 2/27/2005; 2:25 PM by Wallace Koehler
Last Modified 2/27/2005; 4:35 PM by Tom Wilson
In Response To (#Top of Thread.)
Label None. Read 782
<<PREVIOUS NEXT>> TOP THREAD EDIT REPLY
.
I agree with Tom. I have argued much the same elsewhere. The problem(s)
with any free text system -- whether one is asking authors/editors to
provide keywords or to undertake an extensive xml markup is the very
free nature of the process. The process lacks any modicum of the use of
controlled vocabulary. In order to generate anything approaching
relevant retrieval, one would need to have access to multilingual
thesauri well in excess of what the EU, for example, has produced.

Second, any cataloging/indexing scheme left to author discretion runs
the risk of assumptions, time constraints, etc. In order to capture
full semantic meaning using automated mark-up systems, I suspect all
terms would have to indexed together with the aforementioned thesauri.

Thus as Tom suggests not only are we in need of technical models, we
need also consider economic models.

Finally, I question the very exercise. Given the highly fluid nature of
the WWW, what are the implications for any mark up system when the
underlying native document may be changed virtually at the will of its
creator?

Wallace Koehler
.
<<PREVIOUS NEXT>> TOP THREAD EDIT REPLY
ENCLOSURES

None.
REPLIES

None.
 




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.



This site managed with Conversant, © Copyright 2008 Macrobyte Resources

Channels


Digital Libraries

Education

Electronic publishing

Freedom of information

Information Management

Intellectual Property

Internet

Knowledge management

Personal

Records management

Resources

Searching

Software

Technology

Weblogs

Wireless

Words