Guests
Welcome!
Sign Up
Log On

Search


 

Information Research Weblog






Subject RE: "Adaptation" and "derivative work" in Creative Commons
Posted 11/18/2007; 1:16 AM by Bill Hooker
Last Modified 11/18/2007; 7:51 AM by Tom Wilson
In Response To "Adaptation" and "derivative work" in Creative Commons (#916)
Label None. Read 310
<<PREVIOUS NEXT>> TOP THREAD EDIT REPLY
.
The notion that any commercial organization could then take the papers and use them for commercial purposes is a complete anathema to me

Why so? As an author (not in Inf Res, but in other scholarly journals) I would have no objection whatsoever to commercial re-use.

I understand that selling reprints is big business in some fields (e.g. biomed, where Big Pharma likes to send reprints to prescribing physicians), and in such fields smaller publishers avoid CC-BY, keeping the NC license so that the reprint sellers are forced to pay royalties. But unless I missed something, Inf Res is not charging or making money, so what does the journal lose by allowing commercial re-use?

.
<<PREVIOUS NEXT>> TOP THREAD EDIT REPLY
ENCLOSURES

None.
REPLIES

RE: "Adaptation" and "derivative work" in Creative Commons ( 11/18/2007 by Tom Wilson )
I thought I'd explained the reason: it is essentially ethical - why should

 




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.



This site managed with Conversant, © Copyright 2008 Macrobyte Resources

Channels


Digital Libraries

Education

Electronic publishing

Freedom of information

Information Management

Intellectual Property

Internet

Knowledge management

Personal

Records management

Resources

Searching

Software

Technology

Weblogs

Wireless

Words