Information Research Weblog

As usual with things related to Information Research, I have a counter on the top page - kindly provided by NedStat - which provides data on where the 'hits' come from.

Although it is early in the life of the Weblog, it is interesting to see the emerging pattern. We can discount the almost 40% of activity that is within the Weblog itself, since that is simply a record of my 'editorial' work. The interesting things to note - at least I think so - is that almost 20% of hits result form search engine hits. It's nice to know that Google and Yahoo (another way of saying Google) have indexed the site.

It is also interesting to see that more than 60% of the hits come from the journal Web site - which implies that people are following the links from the contents page and the top page of InformationR.net We don't have any library catalogue listings yet, and the number from other Weblogs is small, but, who knows...

I've been a little surprised by how quickly the geographical coverage has increased: initially, the Weblog was getting hits from the UK, the USA and Australia, but now it has hits from 25 countries. I imagine that by the time the next issue of the journal comes out, it could well be double that.

This message was sent to the IR-DISCUSS discussion list and copied directly to the Weblog:

Exploring the Free-Conversant site, I find that members of the Weblog can submite entries by e-mail instead of logging on to the site and using the message box found there. You can even indicate links by using html tags in the body of a plain text e-mail message. Information on doing this is to be found in the Conversant documentation and this shows how you embed the links. To send a message to the site, you simply address it to: irweblog-site@free-conversant.com

To have the message appear in the Weblog, rather than only in the Message Centre, enter the following as the first line of the message: "addToWeblog index " I am simultaneously trying this out as I send this message, as you will see from the first line of this message. Give it a go and let me know what happens - don't worry about posting test messages to the Weblog - I can remove them.

This now appears to be working, after an abortive attempt last week.

Interesting news buzzing around the Web this weekend, started, it seems by Dan Gillmor, a journalist at the San Jose Mercury News, whose item was published today (Sunday 16th February 2003), but who released the story on Saturday night, with the result of course, that it was 'blogged' here, there and everywhere, before you could say 'Bill Gates'.

And the news? Simply that Google has bought the San Francisco company Pyra Labs, the producers of the Blogger software and the associated Weblog services.

There is an obvious synergy between the two systems, in that Google will be able, presumably, to underpin the Blogger Weblogs with its search engine - perhaps enabling a search across all of the Weblogs actually maintained on Pyra's servers - or, on Google's, since, as a result of the deal, Pyra will be moving them on to Google's servers.

I imagine, however, that there is a bigger draw, in that Google moves into a new market, which will, perhaps, pull customers who buy Blogger software to buy Google as an associated search engine. Weblogs are also instant publishing tools, which can be used for much more than the Weblogs and I imagine that some folk at Google will have ideas about what else might be done - ready publishing of in-house company newspapers, perhaps? Insinuating Google into more companies as an intranet search engine as a result? Using it as an e-publishing tool generally for netzines and e-books - all with Google as the search engine?

Pyra Labs has 1.1 million registered users and estimate that about 200,000 are actively running Weblogs - I imagine that that number will grow rapidly as Google moves to gain from its acquisition.

I got a nasty shock tonight when I tried to resume my analysis of the way Weblogs were linking to my paper on knowledge management. I re-ran my search, which had previously revealed about 110 links and this time Google reported no pages! And this was when I used the search for a URL feature in the Advanced search. When I ran the same url in the ordinary search box it came up with 34 links. What's going on here? Does Google drop Weblogs after a certain period of time, or is it only searching on the current pages and dropping the archives?

The helpful folk at Macrobyte have helped with my problem of allowing members to contribute to the log. I have created a small group consisting of people who have been contributing to IR-DISCUSS and this group will find, when they log on, that the 'New Message' box appears at the top of the log - this enables you to post directly into the log.

Anyone else who would like to be able to do this, rather than just read the log can e-mail me - using the New Message link on the Nav bar and I will pick up the mail at the Message Center.

Happy Weblogging!

Tom

Managed to get a look at the Guardian's 'Online' section with my lunch and, lo and behold! the front page article is about businesses becoming interested in Weblogs - not only as information management devices within the firm, but to produce commercial 'blogs'. Those without a daily delivery of the newspaper can find the item at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,884658,00.html

Some interesting links: http://www.buzzmachine.com/

http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/

http://writetheweb.com/Members/gilest/old/123 - this one still believes in knowledge management :-)

and, of course, the Guardian's own Weblog is worth a look: http://www.guardian.co.uk/weblog/0,6798,517233,00.html

Tom

Well done Tom.

One thing about Conversant is it's slightly different from other blogging tools in that it isn't easy for contributors to build a network round it.

I hope you enoy the experience of keeping a weblog. You could always consider keeping a personal one to get the full experience!

Yours

Euan